
Spreadsheets in the initial stage seem pragmatic instead of temporary.
You have a few product categories and one warehouse, and you can expect the same order volumes. Inventory updates are usually made once or twice a day, mainly by the same person. You can easily detect minor mistakes and correct them manually.
In this period, spreadsheets don’t just hold the inventory; they look like they are in charge of it.
That feeling is based on the fact that operational complexities are low at this point. Stock is not moving, operations happen rather informally, and mistakes are few and far between, so people take them easily. Many wholesalers can stay in this phase for several months or even longer.
Yet, the thriving of the spreadsheet is due to the circumstances, not the inherent structure.
Spreadsheets don’t fail in the blink of an eye, as a rule.
They go down bit by bit through friction.
As order volume rises, inventory updates become more frequent. More and more people need to have access. The numbers being correct at that moment, not at the end of the day, become more critical for the decisions made.
This is the time when the first glimpses of problems are observed.
The spreadsheet remains.
But the belief in it begins to weaken.
When inventory comes to a scale, spreadsheets inevitably face certain difficulties.
| Operational Requirement | Spreadsheet Reality |
| Real-time stock visibility | Static snapshots |
| Multiple users updating data | Version conflicts |
| Fast-moving SKUs | Delayed accuracy |
| Stock allocation | Manual tracking |
| Error prevention | Human-dependent |
Each issue is a stand-alone issue that can be handled well.
When these are together, they are difficult to handle and cause harm daily.
One overwritten formula can mislead/alter hundreds of SKUs.
A late update can lead to overselling.
A lost adjustment can lead to buying, fulfilment, and customer service issues.
Unlike in the conception of spreadsheets, missing people is not the only cause, but the system depends on people not to make mistakes at all
Spreadsheets touch their hardness, which is the inventory’s existing limit at one point.
Tentatively, the teams aim to adapt:
What comes out is not a system but a book of rules.
The spreadsheet works if and only if:
Inventory movement is a process, not a number.
Spreadsheets can store outcomes, not manage flow.
The growth of companies results in the shift of inventory decisions from being reactive to process-oriented.
Instead of the initial question, as follows:
“How much stock do we have?”
The team starts to question:
“Which warehouse is better to fulfil this order?”
“Which items do we need to reorder — not just how many?”
“Which SKU is tying cash up for no reason?”
“What is the relation between demand and location, and between demand and channel?”
These inquiries are primarily data-driven.
Just like usual, Spreadsheets can tell what happened yesterday. However, they lack the ability to make decisions about what will take place next time.
| Capability | Spreadsheet-Based Inventory | Data-Driven Inventory System |
| Real-time updates | ❌ | ✅ |
| Multi-warehouse visibility | ❌ | ✅ |
| Stock reservations | ❌ | ✅ |
| Automated alerts | ❌ | ✅ |
| Demand forecasting | ❌ | ✅ |
| Operational dashboards | ❌ | ✅ |
This is the core difference.
Spreadsheets are retrospective tools.
Inventory systems built for scale are decision engines.
Most of the reasons wholesalers will be staying longer in spreadsheets is that the visible costs of change feel higher than the invisible costs of continuing the same way.
However, spreadsheet-based inventory problems are often indirectly observed:
Although these expenses appear in various ways, they end up being unnoticed most of the time.
There is a time when spreadsheets are not questioned anymore. They are circumvented.
Warehouses use counting of physical items.
Sales depend on the experience of “what usually works”.
Purchasing is defensive to orders.
At this moment, the spreadsheet is not a source of truth anymore, right?
It is only a reporting artefact.
That is when companies wake up to the truth – as inventory management diverts from quantities alone to control, visibility, and confidence at scale.
Experience a seamless B2B e-commerce journey with Simplisales.
The future is bright for wholesale businesses. Make it brighter with Simplisales, a simple and affordable B2B e-commerce solution for wholesalers.
Spreadsheets are first-rate tools for organising data, even though they were never intended to run the actual operation in real-time across many locations, teams and sales channels.
That’s precisely the reason decision-making processes based on spreadsheets are not gradually becoming less efficient; it stops functioning because of a spacecraft.
Not because spreadsheets are terrible tools.
But due to the fact that initial businesses might be too fast in outperforming spreadsheets and the stuff they were made to do.
References
Cloud Ease – Spreadsheets: Why They Are Not Effective As An Inventory Management System
Capitalism.com – 5 Reasons Inventory Management Shouldn’t Be In Spreadsheets (For Amazon Sellers)
advantive – 6 Hidden Costs of Using Spreadsheets for Inventory Management
Get the latest commerce news, trends, and strategies to grow your business
By submitting this form, you agree to receive promotional messages from Simplisales